From the Glacier
Philosophy, Science, Mathematics and whatever else

For the sake of?

There is a polemical attitude that seeks to strike discord in communication. Dissecting every sentence, every word, every structure to find fault – this is how these morticians of thought proceed. Avoiding synthesis, they seek to overcome ideas – regardless of the intention of the original author, even intentionally disagreeing with intention. Why? To win. The will to misunderstanding, the will to un-truth as a condition for the will to power.

No Responses Yet to “For the sake of?”

Leave a Reply