More poor reasoning from those who should know better

Ah yes. More goodness from the blog of Fumans asserem. These boys have hit the nail on the head again. Previously, for those with better taste than myself (or perhaps don’t read stupid shit just to get pissed off) who don’t read this crap regularly, they referred to a woman disagreeing with anything they say as “needing a date” or “ugly”. Wow. Spectacular reasoning. Now, if you are male and disagree, you must be gay or get beat up a lot. I find it interesting that for such “good” Catholic boys to use the basest materialistic reasoning – as opposed to actually thinking that anyone could contradict them. One jackass (who, to their credit only comments probably because he has not the fortitude to post for himself) who I don’t know personally, levels some pretty good attacks at my character. “Sophist pantywaist” and “elitist prig” are quite compelling. I feel myself rebuked. Thus sophistry is redefined as disagreeing with those who can only reason ad hominem.